JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Yaneth Espinoza Florez Y Otros Vs. “la Red De Solidaridad Social (Accion Social) Y Otros”

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Diecinueve Administrativo Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca, Seccion Cuarta, Subseccion “b”. Se Redolvio Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca, Seccion Cuarta, Subseccion “b”, Para Que Tramita Y Decida La Accion De Que  Trata.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Cuarta, Subseccion "B", para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Yanet Espinoza Florez y otros, contra "la Red de Solidaridad Social (Accion Social), la Presidencia de la Republica, Bancoldex, Metrovivienda, Fonvivienda".
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado Diecinueve Administrativo del Circuito de Bogota.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.